How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. HA-S36WS vs TAH2000

JVC HA-S36WS vs Philips TAH2000

What HA-S36WS does better (1) and where TAH2000 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JVC HA-S36WS
JVC · 2025HA-S36WS
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $20
Higher score
vs
Philips TAH2000
Philips · 2025TAH2000
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ $19
4.0Noise control & calls4.0
4.4Battery4.2

Why is HA-S36WS better than TAH2000?

  1. Battery life35 h vs 26 h+35%

Why is TAH2000 better than HA-S36WS?

  1. Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5.4+4%
  2. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

JVC HA-S36WSJVC HA-S36WS≈ $204.2
Philips TAH2000Philips TAH2000≈ $194.2
Sound
FitIn-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity—123 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life35 h26 h
Battery capacity—200 mAh
Charging time3 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—15 min → 6 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.4
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight157 g—
FoldableYes—
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare