vs
2.3Battery2.8
Why is HA-KD10W better than TAH5205WT/00?
- Weight110 g vs 210 g+91%
- Charging time3 h vs 3.5 h+17%
Why is TAH5205WT/00 better than HA-KD10W?
- Battery life16 h vs 29 h+81%
- Driver size30 mm vs 40 mm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 30 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 90 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 16 h | 29 h |
| Charging time | 3 h | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 110 g | 210 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | White |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
