vs
6.7Battery9.1
Why is HA-FX150T better than REALTA HP-R300BT?
HA-FX150T has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is REALTA HP-R300BT better than HA-FX150T?
- Battery life9 h vs 12.5 h+39%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · HA-FX150T: Yes
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- LDACNo · HA-FX150T: Yes
- Driver size6 mm vs 8.8 mm+47%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 10 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 95 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 12.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 7.5 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.4 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
