Why is HA-FX150T better than VR P10?
HA-FX150T has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is VR P10 better than HA-FX150T?
- Driver size6 mm vs 11 mm+83%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 11 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | — |
| Battery life with ANC | 7.5 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LC3 |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| Latency | — | 30 ms |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.4 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | — | White |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
