Why is HA-A11T better than QCY-T13?
- aptXYes · QCY-T13: No
Why is QCY-T13 better than HA-A11T?
- Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 7.2 mm+24%
- Earbud weight (each)5.2 g vs 4.5 g+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 105 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 8 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.2 g | 4.5 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
