Why is HA-A11T better than HA-A30T?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- aptXYes · HA-A30T: No
Why is HA-A30T better than HA-A11T?
- Battery life8 h vs 9 h+12%
- Earbud weight (each)5.2 g vs 4.2 g+24%
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 6 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Semi-open |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 9 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 21 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.2 g | 4.2 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
