Why is HA-A110T better than RB-C10?
- Battery life17 h vs 7 h2.4×
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · RB-C10: No
- LDACYes · RB-C10: No
- Charging time2 h vs 2.5 h+25%
Why is RB-C10 better than HA-A110T?
- Driver size10 mm vs 11 mm+10%
- Earbud weight (each)5.7 g vs 5.5 g+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 11 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 17 h | 7 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 13 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.7 g | 5.5 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
