vs
7.2Noise control & calls3.1
Why is HA-A110T better than Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer?
- Active noise cancellingYes · Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer: No
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5+20%
Why is Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer better than HA-A110T?
- Battery life17 h vs 30 h+76%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 17 h | 30 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 13 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.7 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | — | Grey, White |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
