How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Rewind vs TAK4206

JLab Rewind vs Philips TAK4206

What Rewind does better (1) and where TAK4206 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JLab Rewind
JLab · 2020Rewind
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ $25
vs
Philips TAK4206
Philips · 2021TAK4206
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls4.0
3.2Battery4.2

Why is Rewind better than TAK4206?

  1. Driver size36 mm vs 32 mm+12%

Why is TAK4206 better than Rewind?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 28 h2.3×
  2. Bluetooth version4.2 vs 5+19%
Specifications

Side by side

JLab RewindJLab Rewind≈ $254.0
Philips TAK4206Philips TAK4206≈ $254.2
Sound
FitOn-ear—
Ear cup designOpen-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size36 mm32 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity106 dB83 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h28 h
Battery capacity220 mAh—
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 1.5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version4.25
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight57 g—
Foldable—Yes
Features
Touch controlsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare