How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS vs KH-BT04

JLab JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS vs Metz KH-BT04

What JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS does better (1) and where KH-BT04 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

JLab JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS
5.9Score
1 advantage≈ $120
vs
Metz KH-BT04
Metz · 2026KH-BT04
8.8Score
6 advantages≈ $160
Higher score
6.0Noise control & calls8.6
3.6Battery7.7

Why is JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS better than KH-BT04?

  1. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%

Why is KH-BT04 better than JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS?

  1. Battery life24 h vs 60 h2.5×
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS: Yes
  3. Battery capacity380 mAh vs 800 mAh2.1×
  4. aptXNo · JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS: Yes
  5. Charging time2.5 h vs 1.5 h+67%
  6. Driver size35 mm vs 40 mm+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Metz KH-BT04Metz KH-BT04≈ $1608.8
Sound
FitOpen-earOver-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size35 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity94 dB—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Noise reduction (claimed)42 dB—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones2—
Noise reduction for callsYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life24 h60 h
Battery life with ANC—40 h
Battery capacity380 mAh800 mAh
Charging time2.5 h1.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 2.5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCaptX HD
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoYes
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Latency200 ms—
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight245 g245 g
FoldableYesYes
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare