vs
3.8Battery4.8
9.5Build & features6.3
Why is JBuds Mini ANC better than HA-A4T?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Earbud weight (each)3.1 g vs 4 g+29%
Why is HA-A4T better than JBuds Mini ANC?
- Battery life7 h vs 7.5 h+7%
- Driver size6 mm vs 12 mm2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Semi-in-ear (open) |
| Ear cup design | — | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Noise reduction (claimed) | 38 dB | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 7.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 5.5 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 25 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 3.1 g | 4 g |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JVC HA-A4TvsJVC HA-A22T5.47.1vs
JVC HA-A4TvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervs
JVC HA-A4TvsSoundcore R50i NCvs
JVC HA-A4TvsJVC HA-A23T5.47.6
vsQCY MeloBuds A30 Kabellose Ohrhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 LDAC IPX5 goldenvsJVC HA-A4Tvs
JVC HA-A4TvsQCY MeloBuds A30 kabellose Ohrhörer ANC, Bluetooth 6.0