How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Wave Buds vs TAT3509

JBL Wave Buds vs Philips TAT3509

What Wave Buds does better (0) and where TAT3509 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Wave Buds
JBL · 2022Wave Buds
4.9Score
0 advantages≈ $35
vs
Philips TAT3509
Philips · 2024TAT3509
5.9Score
2 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
4.6Noise control & calls7.2
5.6Battery4.6
5.6Build & features5.5

Why is Wave Buds better than TAT3509?

Wave Buds has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAT3509 better than Wave Buds?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Wave Buds: Yes
  2. Driver size8 mm vs 10 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Wave BudsJBL Wave Buds≈ $354.9
Philips TAT3509Philips TAT3509≈ $355.9
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size8 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB104 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h8 h
Battery life with ANC—6 h
Total with charging case—24 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight—45 g
Earbud weight (each)4.5 g—
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare