vs
3.0Noise control & calls3.0
2.3Battery2.6
Why is Wave 200TWS better than TW-E3A?
Wave 200TWS has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TW-E3A better than Wave 200TWS?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx52.5×
- Battery life5 h vs 6 h+20%
- Total with charging case20 h vs 24 h+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 8 mm | — |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | 20 h | 24 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 8.7 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX2 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
