vs
3.1Noise control & calls7.2
2.3Battery3.6
2.0Build & features4.7
Why is Wave 200TWS better than Enco Free2?
Wave 200TWS has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Enco Free2 better than Wave 200TWS?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Wave 200TWS: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
- Battery life5 h vs 6 h+20%
- Total with charging case20 h vs 30 h+50%
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
- Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
- Driver size8 mm vs 10 mm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 8 mm | 10 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | — | 103 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 6 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 4 h |
| Total with charging case | 20 h | 30 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 48 g |
| Earbud weight (each) | 8.7 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX2 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
