vs
2.3Battery2.4
2.0Build & features6.4
Why is Wave 200TWS better than HA-A5T?
- Driver size8 mm vs 6 mm+33%
Why is HA-A5T better than Wave 200TWS?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
- Earbud weight (each)8.7 g vs 3.9 g2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 8 mm | 6 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 5 h |
| Total with charging case | 20 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 8.7 g | 3.9 g |
| Protection rating | IPX2 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
