How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 780NC vs TAH8000E

JBL Tune 780NC vs Philips TAH8000E

What Tune 780NC does better (3) and where TAH8000E wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 780NC
JBL · 2025Tune 780NC
8.6Score
3 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Philips TAH8000E
Philips · 2026TAH8000E
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $80
5.8Noise control & calls6.1
8.4Battery8.4

Why is Tune 780NC better than TAH8000E?

  1. Battery life76 h vs 70 h+9%
  2. Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
  3. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%

Why is TAH8000E better than Tune 780NC?

  1. Microphones2 vs 52.5×
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 780NCJBL Tune 780NC≈ $758.6
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency10 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—112 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones25
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life76 h70 h
Battery life with ANC50 h50 h
Battery capacity—1,100 mAh
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 8 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—260 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare