How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 780NC vs NTH-50

JBL Tune 780NC vs Rode NTH-50

What Tune 780NC does better (1) and where NTH-50 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 780NC
JBL · 2025Tune 780NC
8.6Score
1 advantage≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Rode NTH-50
Rode · 2025NTH-50
0 advantages≈ $85
6.0Noise control & calls3.9

Why is Tune 780NC better than NTH-50?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · NTH-50: No

Why is NTH-50 better than Tune 780NC?

NTH-50 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 780NCJBL Tune 780NC≈ $758.6
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm—
Lowest frequency10 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—124 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones2—
Battery & charging
Battery life76 h—
Battery life with ANC50 h—
Charging time2 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version6—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Colours—Black
Features
Touch controlsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare