vs
5.8Noise control & calls9.2
8.4Battery8.4
Why is Tune 780NC better than M-298?
- Battery life76 h vs 66 h+15%
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is M-298 better than Tune 780NC?
M-298 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 107 dB |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 76 h | 66 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 50 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 240 g |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
