How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TUNE 775NC vs ICON ANC

JBL TUNE 775NC vs Skullcandy ICON ANC

What TUNE 775NC does better (1) and where ICON ANC wins (3) — every spec side by side.

JBL TUNE 775NC
JBL · 2026TUNE 775NC
8.6Score
1 advantage≈ $80
Higher score
vs
Skullcandy ICON ANC
Skullcandy · 2025ICON ANC
7.8Score
3 advantages≈ $85
7.9Noise control & calls7.2
7.6Battery7.5

Why is TUNE 775NC better than ICON ANC?

  1. Battery life70 h vs 60 h+17%

Why is ICON ANC better than TUNE 775NC?

  1. Driver size4 mm vs 40 mm10×
  2. Battery life with ANC44 h vs 50 h+14%
  3. Weight232 g vs 225 g+3%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL TUNE 775NCJBL TUNE 775NC≈ $808.6
Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size4 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB98 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life70 h60 h
Battery life with ANC44 h50 h
Battery capacity70 mAh—
Charging time1 h—
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight232 g225 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
FoldableYesYes
ColoursBlackPrimer, True Black, Bone/Orange, Realtree APX Black/Orange
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare