How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 760NC vs TAA4216BK/00

JBL Tune 760NC vs Philips TAA4216BK/00

What Tune 760NC does better (2) and where TAA4216BK/00 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 760NC
JBL · 2022Tune 760NC
8.2Score
2 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Philips TAA4216BK/00
Philips · 2021TAA4216BK/00
6.0Score
1 advantage≈ $50
9.2Noise control & calls3.8
5.8Battery5.4

Why is Tune 760NC better than TAA4216BK/00?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAA4216BK/00: No
  2. Battery life50 h vs 35 h+43%

Why is TAA4216BK/00 better than Tune 760NC?

  1. Weight220 g vs 214 g+3%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 760NCJBL Tune 760NC≈ $758.2
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity103 dB118 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h35 h
Battery life with ANC35 h—
Charging time2 h2 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantAlexa, Google Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight220 g214 g
Protection rating—IP55
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
Foldable—Yes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare