How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TUNE 660NC vs TAA4216BK/00

JBL TUNE 660NC vs Philips TAA4216BK/00

What TUNE 660NC does better (3) and where TAA4216BK/00 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL TUNE 660NC
JBL · 2020TUNE 660NC
8.7Score
3 advantages≈ $50
Higher score
vs
Philips TAA4216BK/00
Philips · 2021TAA4216BK/00
6.0Score
1 advantage≈ $50
9.2Noise control & calls3.8
6.8Battery5.4

Why is TUNE 660NC better than TAA4216BK/00?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAA4216BK/00: No
  2. Battery life55 h vs 35 h+57%
  3. Weight166 g vs 214 g+29%

Why is TAA4216BK/00 better than TUNE 660NC?

  1. Driver size32 mm vs 40 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL TUNE 660NCJBL TUNE 660NC≈ $508.7
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB118 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Battery & charging
Battery life55 h35 h
Battery life with ANC44 h—
Battery capacity610 mAh—
Charging time2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantAlexa, Google Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight166 g214 g
Protection rating—IP55
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
FoldableYesYes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare