How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TUNE 660NC vs KH-KZ30

JBL TUNE 660NC vs Kenwood KH-KZ30

What TUNE 660NC does better (3) and where KH-KZ30 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL TUNE 660NC
JBL · 2020TUNE 660NC
8.7Score
3 advantages≈ $50
Higher score
vs
Kenwood KH-KZ30
Kenwood · 2022KH-KZ30
2 advantages≈ $30
6.8Battery4.5

Why is TUNE 660NC better than KH-KZ30?

  1. Battery life55 h vs 35 h+57%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
  3. Driver size32 mm vs 30 mm+7%

Why is KH-KZ30 better than TUNE 660NC?

  1. Weight166 g vs 157 g+6%
  2. Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL TUNE 660NCJBL TUNE 660NC≈ $508.7
Sound
FitOn-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm30 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity100 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life55 h35 h
Battery life with ANC44 h—
Battery capacity610 mAh—
Charging time2 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55.2
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantAlexa, Google Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight166 g157 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare