How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 520BT2 vs TAK4200

JBL Tune 520BT2 vs Philips TAK4200

What Tune 520BT2 does better (3) and where TAK4200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 520BT2
JBL · 2026Tune 520BT2
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
vs
Philips TAK4200
Philips · 2026TAK4200
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $35
5.6Noise control & calls5.5
8.6Battery5.7

Why is Tune 520BT2 better than TAK4200?

  1. Battery life76 h vs 45 h+69%
  2. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
  3. Driver size33 mm vs 32 mm+3%

Why is TAK4200 better than Tune 520BT2?

  1. Weight158 g vs 129 g+22%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 520BT2JBL Tune 520BT2≈ $406.8
Philips TAK4200Philips TAK4200≈ $354.5
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size33 mm32 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance30 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity101 dB85 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for callsYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life76 h45 h
Battery capacity—300 mAh
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-C—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight158 g129 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare