How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 520BT2 vs TAH4500

JBL Tune 520BT2 vs Philips TAH4500

What Tune 520BT2 does better (0) and where TAH4500 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 520BT2
JBL · 2026Tune 520BT2
6.8Score
0 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
vs
Philips TAH4500
Philips · 2026TAH4500
1 advantage≈ $35
5.6Noise control & calls9.2

Why is Tune 520BT2 better than TAH4500?

Tune 520BT2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAH4500 better than Tune 520BT2?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Tune 520BT2: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 520BT2JBL Tune 520BT2≈ $406.8
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size33 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance30 Ω—
Sensitivity101 dB113 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life76 h—
Battery capacity—500 mAh
Charging time2 h—
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version66
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight158 g—
FoldableYes—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare