How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 520BT2 vs Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h

JBL Tune 520BT2 vs LogiLink Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h

What Tune 520BT2 does better (2) and where Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 520BT2
JBL · 2026Tune 520BT2
6.8Score
2 advantages≈ $40
vs
LogiLink Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h
7.7Score
2 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
5.6Noise control & calls9.2
8.6Battery5.3

Why is Tune 520BT2 better than Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h?

  1. Battery life76 h vs 40 h+90%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 2.5 h+25%

Why is Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h better than Tune 520BT2?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Tune 520BT2: Yes
  2. Driver size33 mm vs 40 mm+21%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 520BT2JBL Tune 520BT2≈ $406.8
Sound
FitOn-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size33 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance30 Ω—
Sensitivity101 dB100 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life76 h40 h
Charging time2 h2.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version66
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight158 g—
FoldableYes—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare