How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 520BT2 vs GO Work 3

JBL Tune 520BT2 vs JLab GO Work 3

What Tune 520BT2 does better (3) and where GO Work 3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 520BT2
JBL · 2026Tune 520BT2
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
vs
JLab GO Work 3
JLab · 2026GO Work 3
1 advantage≈ $55
8.5Battery8.2

Why is Tune 520BT2 better than GO Work 3?

  1. Battery life76 h vs 70 h+9%
  2. Microphones4 vs 22×
  3. Weight158 g vs 189 g+20%

Why is GO Work 3 better than Tune 520BT2?

  1. Driver size33 mm vs 40 mm+21%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 520BT2JBL Tune 520BT2≈ $406.8
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size33 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance30 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity101 dB—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNo—
Microphones42
Noise reduction for callsYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life76 h70 h
Battery capacity—500 mAh
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version6—
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-C—Yes
Latency—50 ms
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight158 g189 g
FoldableYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare