7.1Battery5.9
Why is Tune 520BT better than HA-S60W?
- Battery life57 h vs 50 h+14%
- Charging time2 h vs 2.5 h+25%
- Driver size33 mm vs 30 mm+10%
Why is HA-S60W better than Tune 520BT?
- Weight157 g vs 149 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 33 mm | 30 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 30 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | 96 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 57 h | 50 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2.5 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 5 min → 1 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 157 g | 149 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
