How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 520BT vs HA-S36W

JBL Tune 520BT vs JVC HA-S36W

What Tune 520BT does better (3) and where HA-S36W wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 520BT
JBL · 2023Tune 520BT
4.9Score
3 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
vs
JVC HA-S36W
JVC · 2023HA-S36W
4.2Score
0 advantages≈ $20
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
7.1Battery4.5

Why is Tune 520BT better than HA-S36W?

  1. Battery life57 h vs 35 h+63%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
  3. Driver size33 mm vs 30 mm+10%

Why is HA-S36W better than Tune 520BT?

HA-S36W has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 520BTJBL Tune 520BT≈ $304.9
JVC HA-S36WJVC HA-S36W≈ $204.2
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size33 mm30 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance30 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity102 dB—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life57 h35 h
Charging time2 h3 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight157 g157 g
FoldableYes—
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare