vs
3.0Noise control & calls7.2
9.4Battery7.7
Why is Tune 510BT better than Ne tiny HP-T200BT?
- Battery life16 h vs 10 h+60%
- Driver size32 mm vs 6 mm5.3×
Why is Ne tiny HP-T200BT better than Tune 510BT?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Tune 510BT: Yes
- Bluetooth version4.1 vs 5.1+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 32 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 97 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 16 h | 10 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 155 g | — |
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
