vs
6.1Noise control & calls3.0
3.9Battery9.4
Why is Elite 4 Active better than Tune 510BT?
- Active noise cancellingYes · Tune 510BT: No
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 4.1+27%
Why is Tune 510BT better than Elite 4 Active?
- Battery life7 h vs 16 h2.3×
- Driver size6 mm vs 32 mm5.3×
- Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 32 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Microphones | 4 | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 16 h |
| Total with charging case | 28 h | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 1 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 4.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 155 g |
| Earbud weight (each) | 10 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP57 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Sony LinkBuds SvsJabra Elite 4 Active6.56.7vs
Jabra Elite 4 ActivevsAudio Technica ATH-CKS30TW6.77.2vs
Jabra Elite 4 ActivevsGoogle Pixel Buds Pro6.76.8vs
Jabra Elite 4 ActivevsAudio Technica ATH-CKS50TW6.76.4
vsJBL Tune Flex TWSvsJabra Elite 4 Active6.56.7
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro SM-R510vsJabra Elite 4 Active6.56.7