How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 305C USB vs TAE4105

JBL Tune 305C USB vs Philips TAE4105

What Tune 305C USB does better (2) and where TAE4105 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 305C USB
JBL · 2024Tune 305C USB
2 advantages≈ $16
vs
Philips TAE4105
Philips · 2020TAE4105
0 advantages≈ $17

Why is Tune 305C USB better than TAE4105?

  1. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  2. Driver size12.5 mm vs 10 mm+25%

Why is TAE4105 better than Tune 305C USB?

TAE4105 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12.5 mm10 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity102 dB104 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Connectivity
WirelessNoNo
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight15 g—
Protection rating—IPX2
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx2
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare