How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 305C USB vs TAE1105/00

JBL Tune 305C USB vs Philips TAE1105/00

What Tune 305C USB does better (3) and where TAE1105/00 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 305C USB
JBL · 2024Tune 305C USB
3 advantages≈ $16
vs
Philips TAE1105/00
Philips · 2020TAE1105/00
0 advantages≈ $8

Why is Tune 305C USB better than TAE1105/00?

  1. Weight15 g vs 35 g2.3×
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  3. Driver size12.5 mm vs 8.6 mm+45%

Why is TAE1105/00 better than Tune 305C USB?

TAE1105/00 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size12.5 mm8.6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity102 dB102 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Connectivity
WirelessNoNo
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight15 g35 g
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare