How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
Compare
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
CompareRankings
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAE1105/00 vs Ink'd

Philips TAE1105/00 vs Skullcandy Ink'd

What TAE1105/00 does better (0) and where Ink'd wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAE1105/00
Philips · 2020TAE1105/00
0 advantages≈ $8
vs
Skullcandy Ink'd
Skullcandy · 2020Ink'd
2 advantages≈ $11

Why is TAE1105/00 better than Ink'd?

TAE1105/00 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Ink'd better than TAE1105/00?

  1. Weight35 g vs 1 g31.2×
  2. Driver size8.6 mm vs 10 mm+16%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAE1105/00Philips TAE1105/00≈ $8
Skullcandy Ink'dSkullcandy Ink'd≈ $11
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size8.6 mm10 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity102 dB—
Connectivity
WirelessNoNo
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight35 g1 g

Related comparisons

Samsung 3,5 mm EO-IA500vsPhilips TAE1105/00Samsung 3,5 mm EO-IA500vsPhilips TAE1105/00Philips TAE1105/00vs4smarts Melody Digital BasicPhilips TAE1105/00vs4smarts Melody Digital BasicSkullcandy Ink'dvsSamsung 3,5 mm EO-IA500Skullcandy Ink'dvsSamsung 3,5 mm EO-IA500Philips TAA1105vsSkullcandy Ink'dPhilips TAA1105vsSkullcandy Ink'd
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare