How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 305C USB vs TAA5608BK/00

JBL Tune 305C USB vs Philips TAA5608BK/00

What Tune 305C USB does better (2) and where TAA5608BK/00 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 305C USB
JBL · 2024Tune 305C USB
2 advantages≈ $16
vs
Philips TAA5608BK/00
Philips · 2023TAA5608BK/00
0 advantages≈ $30

Why is Tune 305C USB better than TAA5608BK/00?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 130 Hz6.5×
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 16,000 Hz2.5×

Why is TAA5608BK/00 better than Tune 305C USB?

TAA5608BK/00 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earBone conduction
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12.5 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz130 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz16,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω8 Ω
Sensitivity102 dB88 dB
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life—6 h
Charging time—6 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
Bluetooth codecs—LC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Weight15 g—
Protection rating—IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare