How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 305C USB vs HA-FX28W

JBL Tune 305C USB vs JVC HA-FX28W

What Tune 305C USB does better (2) and where HA-FX28W wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 305C USB
JBL · 2024Tune 305C USB
2 advantages≈ $16
vs
JVC HA-FX28W
JVC · 2020HA-FX28W
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ $19
Higher score

Why is Tune 305C USB better than HA-FX28W?

  1. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  2. Driver size12.5 mm vs 8.6 mm+45%

Why is HA-FX28W better than Tune 305C USB?

  1. Weight15 g vs 13 g+18%
Specifications

Side by side

JVC HA-FX28WJVC HA-FX28W≈ $193.6
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12.5 mm8.6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity102 dB—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life—6.5 h
Charging time—3 h
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Weight15 g13 g
Protection rating—IPX2
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx2
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare