vs
9.4Battery8.5
4.3Build & features4.1
Why is Tune 235BT better than WI-C100?
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5+8%
- Weight19 g vs 20 g+4%
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
- Driver size12.5 mm vs 9 mm+39%
Why is WI-C100 better than Tune 235BT?
WI-C100 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Neckband | Neckband |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12.5 mm | 9 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 25 h | 25 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 3 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 19 g | 20 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
