vs
4.5Build & features2.4
Why is TUNE 135BT better than Mode USB-C?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx0
Why is Mode USB-C better than TUNE 135BT?
- Weight19 g vs 18 g+4%
- Driver size8.6 mm vs 9 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 8.6 mm | 9 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 99 dB | 100 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 25 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 130 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 19 g | 18 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx0 |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
