How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TUNE 125BT vs TAA5608BK/00

JBL TUNE 125BT vs Philips TAA5608BK/00

What TUNE 125BT does better (4) and where TAA5608BK/00 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL TUNE 125BT
JBL · 2022TUNE 125BT
4.6Score
4 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
vs
Philips TAA5608BK/00
Philips · 2023TAA5608BK/00
1 advantage≈ $30
7.9Battery2.4

Why is TUNE 125BT better than TAA5608BK/00?

  1. Battery life16 h vs 6 h2.7×
  2. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 130 Hz6.5×
  3. Charging time2 h vs 6 h3×
  4. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 16,000 Hz+25%

Why is TAA5608BK/00 better than TUNE 125BT?

  1. Bluetooth version5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL TUNE 125BTJBL TUNE 125BT≈ $304.6
Sound
FitIn-earBone conduction
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size8.6 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz130 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz16,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω8 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB88 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNo—
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life16 h6 h
Charging time2 h6 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Protection rating—IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare