How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tour One M3 vs WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration

JBL Tour One M3 vs Sony WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration

What Tour One M3 does better (3) and where WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration wins (3) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tour One M3
JBL · 2025Tour One M3
7.9Score
3 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
vs
Sony WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration
5.3Score
3 advantages≈ $270
6.7Noise control & calls6.2
7.6Battery3.7

Why is Tour One M3 better than WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration?

  1. Battery life70 h vs 34 h2.1×
  2. Battery life with ANC40 h vs 27 h+48%
  3. Microphones8 vs 5+60%

Why is WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration better than Tour One M3?

  1. Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 4 Hz2.5×
  2. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
  3. Weight278 g vs 253 g+10%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tour One M3JBL Tour One M3≈ $2707.9
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency10 Hz4 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance18 Ω—
Sensitivity122 dB106 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Head trackingYes—
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones85
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life70 h34 h
Battery life with ANC40 h27 h
Charging time2 h—
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.36
Bluetooth codecsLDACLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXNoNo
LDACYesYes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight278 g253 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare