How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. LIVE 680NC vs TAH8000E

JBL LIVE 680NC vs Philips TAH8000E

What LIVE 680NC does better (4) and where TAH8000E wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL LIVE 680NC
JBL · 2026LIVE 680NC
8.8Score
4 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
vs
Philips TAH8000E
Philips · 2026TAH8000E
8.4Score
0 advantages≈ $80
8.7Sound6.1
7.8Noise control & calls6.1
9.0Battery8.4

Why is LIVE 680NC better than TAH8000E?

  1. Battery life80 h vs 70 h+14%
  2. Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
  3. Weight231 g vs 260 g+12%
  4. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%

Why is TAH8000E better than LIVE 680NC?

TAH8000E has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

JBL LIVE 680NCJBL LIVE 680NC≈ $1108.8
Sound
Fit—Over-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency10 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity98 dB112 dB
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—5
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life80 h70 h
Battery life with ANC50 h50 h
Battery capacity—1,100 mAh
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 8 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBCLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXNoNo
LDACYesYes
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE AudioYesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight231 g260 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare