How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Junior 320 vs TAK4200

JBL Junior 320 vs Philips TAK4200

What Junior 320 does better (1) and where TAK4200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Junior 320
JBL · 2024Junior 320
1 advantage≈ $25
vs
Philips TAK4200
Philips · 2026TAK4200
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $35
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls5.5

Why is Junior 320 better than TAK4200?

  1. Weight117 g vs 129 g+10%

Why is TAK4200 better than Junior 320?

  1. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAK4200Philips TAK4200≈ $354.5
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm32 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance34 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity78 dB85 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—45 h
Battery capacity—300 mAh
Charging time3 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.4
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight117 g129 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare