How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Endurance Run 3 Wired 3,5 mm vs TAT1300

JBL Endurance Run 3 Wired 3,5 mm vs Philips TAT1300

What Endurance Run 3 Wired 3,5 mm does better (2) and where TAT1300 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL Endurance Run 3 Wired 3,5 mm
2 advantages≈ $20
vs
Philips TAT1300
Philips · 2026TAT1300
4.1Score
0 advantages≈ $18
Higher score
3.1Noise control & calls3.1

Why is Endurance Run 3 Wired 3,5 mm better than TAT1300?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
  2. Charging time2.5 h vs 3 h+20%

Why is TAT1300 better than Endurance Run 3 Wired 3,5 mm?

TAT1300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT1300Philips TAT1300≈ $184.1
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—105 Ω
Sensitivity—105 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life—6 h
Charging time2.5 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—6
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight—34 g
Protection ratingIP65IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx4
Dust protection (IP)6—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare