How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. BOOMBOX3 vs Stanmore III

JBL BOOMBOX3 vs Marshall Stanmore III

What BOOMBOX3 does better (2) and where Stanmore III wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL BOOMBOX3
JBL · 2022BOOMBOX3
9.2Score
2 advantages≈ $310
Higher score
vs
Marshall Stanmore III
Marshall · 2022Stanmore III
4.6Score
0 advantages≈ $280
6.7Build & features2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

BOOMBOX3Stanmore III
482 × 257200350 × 203188
BOOMBOX3Stanmore IIIDifference
Height257 mm203 mm+54 mm
Width482 mm350 mm+132 mm
Depth200 mm188 mm+12 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is BOOMBOX3 better than Stanmore III?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx0
  2. Lowest frequency40 Hz vs 45 Hz+12%

Why is Stanmore III better than BOOMBOX3?

Stanmore III has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

JBL BOOMBOX3JBL BOOMBOX3≈ $3109.2
Sound
Output power—80 W
Speaker channels—Stereo
Lowest frequency40 Hz45 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Stereo—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life24 h—
Power bank functionYes—
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)YesNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
LE Audio—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
HDMI eARC / ARC—Yes
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—4,250 g
Width482 mm350 mm
Height257 mm203 mm
Depth200 mm188 mm
Protection ratingIP67—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx0
Dust protection (IP)6—
Features
Party / stereo pairingYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare