vs
3.1Noise control & calls5.5
2.2Battery2.3
Why is ITW-4000-2 better than TAT2520?
- Total with charging case16 h vs 14 h+14%
- Charging time1.8 h vs 2 h+11%
Why is TAT2520 better than ITW-4000-2?
- Active noise cancellingNo · ITW-4000-2: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 107 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4 h | 4 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 4 h |
| Total with charging case | 16 h | 14 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 40 mAh |
| Charging time | 1.8 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
