How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. FreeBuds SE 4 ANC vs TAQ2000

Huawei FreeBuds SE 4 ANC vs Philips TAQ2000

What FreeBuds SE 4 ANC does better (4) and where TAQ2000 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Huawei FreeBuds SE 4 ANC
Huawei · 2025FreeBuds SE 4 ANC
7.5Score
4 advantages≈ $45
Higher score
vs
Philips TAQ2000
Philips · 2025TAQ2000
4.4Score
2 advantages≈ $40
5.6Noise control & calls3.1
7.5Battery4.6
5.8Build & features4.6

Why is FreeBuds SE 4 ANC better than TAQ2000?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAQ2000: No
  2. Battery life10 h vs 7 h+43%
  3. Total with charging case50 h vs 28 h+79%
  4. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 100 Hz5×

Why is TAQ2000 better than FreeBuds SE 4 ANC?

  1. Battery capacity41 mAh vs 51 mAh+24%
  2. Driver size10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAQ2000Philips TAQ2000≈ $404.4
Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz100 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—113 dB
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones3—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h7 h
Battery life with ANC7 h—
Total with charging case50 h28 h
Battery capacity41 mAh51 mAh
Charging time2 h2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight—48 g
Earbud weight (each)4.3 g—
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare