How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. FreeBuds SE 3 vs TAQ2000

Huawei FreeBuds SE 3 vs Philips TAQ2000

What FreeBuds SE 3 does better (5) and where TAQ2000 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Huawei FreeBuds SE 3
Huawei · 2025FreeBuds SE 3
8.2Score
5 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
vs
Philips TAQ2000
Philips · 2025TAQ2000
4.3Score
2 advantages≈ $30
9.3Noise control & calls3.0
7.3Battery4.5
6.5Build & features5.2

Why is FreeBuds SE 3 better than TAQ2000?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAQ2000: No
  2. Battery life9 h vs 7 h+29%
  3. Total with charging case42 h vs 28 h+50%
  4. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 100 Hz5×
  5. Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×

Why is TAQ2000 better than FreeBuds SE 3?

  1. Battery capacity41 mAh vs 51 mAh+24%
  2. Driver size10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAQ2000Philips TAQ2000≈ $304.3
Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz100 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—113 dB
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Battery & charging
Battery life9 h7 h
Total with charging case42 h28 h
Battery capacity41 mAh51 mAh
Charging time1 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 3 h—
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight—48 g
Earbud weight (each)3.8 g—
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare