How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAQ2000 vs Smokin' Buds

Philips TAQ2000 vs Skullcandy Smokin' Buds

What TAQ2000 does better (3) and where Smokin' Buds wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAQ2000
Philips · 2025TAQ2000
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ $30
vs
Skullcandy Smokin' Buds
Skullcandy · 2025Smokin' Buds
4.4Score
3 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
3.0Noise control & calls3.0
4.5Battery4.6
5.2Build & features5.8

Why is TAQ2000 better than Smokin' Buds?

  1. Total with charging case28 h vs 20 h+40%
  2. Driver size12 mm vs 6 mm2×
  3. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.2+4%

Why is Smokin' Buds better than TAQ2000?

  1. Battery life7 h vs 8 h+14%
  2. Lowest frequency100 Hz vs 20 Hz5×
  3. Weight48 g vs 41 g+18%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAQ2000Philips TAQ2000≈ $304.3
Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency100 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity113 dB104 dB
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life7 h8 h
Total with charging case28 h20 h
Battery capacity51 mAh50 mAh
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 2 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.2
Bluetooth codecsSBCAAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight48 g41 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Colours—Matcha, Flame, Bone, Smoke, Preppy Blue, Pink, Preppy Sage, True Black
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare