vs
6.4Battery4.8
Why is Choice Earbuds S8 better than HA-A4T?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · HA-A4T: No
- Battery life8 h vs 7.5 h+7%
- LDACYes · HA-A4T: No
Why is HA-A4T better than Choice Earbuds S8?
- Driver size11 mm vs 12 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Semi-in-ear (open) |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 11 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 7.5 h |
| Total with charging case | 38 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JVC HA-A4TvsJVC HA-A22T5.47.1vs
JVC HA-A4TvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervs
JVC HA-A4TvsSoundcore R50i NCvs
JVC HA-A4TvsJVC HA-A23T5.47.6
vsQCY MeloBuds A30 Kabellose Ohrhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 LDAC IPX5 goldenvsJVC HA-A4Tvs
JVC HA-A4TvsQCY MeloBuds A30 kabellose Ohrhörer ANC, Bluetooth 6.0