vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aura Studio 4SRS-XG300
| Aura Studio 4 | SRS-XG300 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 284 mm | 138 mm | +146 mm |
| Width | 232 mm | 318 mm | −86 mm |
| Depth | 232 mm | 136 mm | +96 mm |
| Weight | 3,600 g | 3,000 g | +600 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aura Studio 4 better than SRS-XG300?
Aura Studio 4 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is SRS-XG300 better than Aura Studio 4?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Aura Studio 4: Yes
- Lowest frequency45 Hz vs 20 Hz2.2×
- Bluetooth version4.2 vs 5.2+24%
- LDACNo · Aura Studio 4: Yes
- Weight3,600 g vs 3,000 g+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 130 W | — |
| Speaker channels | — | Stereo |
| Lowest frequency | 45 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Stereo | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 25 h |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 3,600 g | 3,000 g |
| Width | 232 mm | 318 mm |
| Height | 284 mm | 138 mm |
| Depth | 232 mm | 136 mm |
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
| Party / stereo pairing | — | Yes |
| Light effects | Yes | Yes |
