vs
3.8Noise control & calls5.5
Why is Bluetooth Headphone better than TAK4200?
Bluetooth Headphone has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TAK4200 better than Bluetooth Headphone?
- Battery capacity150 mAh vs 300 mAh2×
- Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 32 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB | 85 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 45 h |
| Battery capacity | 150 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 129 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Colours | White | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
